By DemocracyRules
The IAEA's new report on Syria focuses on allegations that a building destroyed by an Israeli air strike in April 2008 was a nuclear reactor. The location is called Dair Azour (also known as Al Kibar).
According to the IAEA report, a significant number of particles of natural uranium from made-made sources were found in samples from the site.
The IAEA says the overall water infrastructure and pumping capacity, as well as the electrical capacity that it saw during its June 2008 visit to the site would be sufficient to operate a 25 MWt reactor.
Based on satellite imagery of the site before and after the bombing, the features of the destroyed building coupled with the availability of adequate pumped water "are similar to what may be found in connection with a reactor site," the IAEA notes.
The IAEA says it was severely hampered in its safeguards duties by the unilateral use of force in destroying the site and the late provision of information concerning the building.
So much for all the baloney and bafflegab the MSM spewed around about this issue. We now know for sure that: (1) Syria was building nuclear weapons, (2) North Korea was helping, (3) Israel was right to have bombed the facility, and (4) Assad was lying about everything.
Furthermore, it also seems likely that, (1) Assad wasn't going to fry eggs with those nukes, (2) Syria and Iran are both in cahoots with North Korea in nuke development, (3) There are at least two other nuke facilities in Syria, (4) When Saddam shipped about 55 planeloads of WMD to Syria before the beginning of Operation Iraqi Freedom, some of that was nuke technology, and (5) Obama will have no idea how to handle all this, until Assad hands him a Pollonium sandwich.
Pro Patria
Comments