The family of John Edward's mistress has challenged him to take a paternity test.
What I want to know is: Is John Edwards saying the baby isn't his because the timing really is impossible, or is he saying the timing is impossible because --after cheating on his wife in 2006 and "renewing their vows" in July 2007 -- he promised Elizabeth he'd never cheat again, and then did?
Given that Edwards was caught visiting Hunter at a Los Angeles hotel in the small hours of the morning on July 22nd, it seems obvious that his claim not to have continued the affair with Hunter after 2006 is just another lie.
The baby's birth certificate names no father. The most likely explanation is that Edwards is the baby's father, or that he and Hunter assume he probably is.
What are we left with?
Another leading light in the Democratic Party is an untrustworthy, lying phony.
"In sickness and in health, 'til death do us part" is now "In sickness and in health, until it gets to be kind of a drag."
I'd like to see some leading Democrats step up to the plate and at least put in a good word for values, committment, and standing by one's cancer-sticken loved ones in sickness and in health.
Comments