My Photo

Recent Comments

COMMENTS?

  • We love comments, but they are treated like letters to the editor -- only some are permanently published. Comments may be depublished or edited if they contain profanity or personal attacks or if they include statements that are false, defamatory, unethical, immoral, or illogical. Rude or inappropriate comments or spam may result in a permanent website ban (comments auto-deleted), so don't do that. Thanks.
  • Google

Like This Blog?

  • Add this blog to my Technorati Favorites!

    Subscribe in NewsGator Online

    Add to Google

    Subscribe in Bloglines

    Add to My AOL

  • Word of the Day

    This Day in History

    In the News

    Quote of the Day

    Spelling Bee
    difficulty level:
    score: -
    please wait...
     
    spell the word:

    Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

20 entries categorized "Technology"

February 10, 2008

Chavez Threatens to Halt Oil Sales to US

By DemocracyRules
Hmm...

This could be a blessing in disguise actually:

Apocalypto3lg

New Canadian Nuclear Power Station in Works For US Energy Export

New Canadian ACR-1000 Advanced Candu Reactor Cheaper, Faster, Safer, Better

New CANDU Nuclear Reactor planned for Alberta to provide heat for oil sands extraction

Solar Energy Now Cheaper Than Coal and Falling

Nanosolar 'prints' first flexible solar cells

Toshiba's new SCiB battery charges in 5 minutes, to be released in March 2008 for electric vehicles

Lithium Technology’s new battery pushes Toyota Prius to 125 MPG

No Real Worldwide Oil Shortage Seen, Iraq Set To Boost Production

US has been planning around Venezuela oil interruptions for years because of greasy little dweeb Chavez

In Jan 2005, Senator John McCain said the U.S. needs to develop alternate energy suppliers to avoid being held hostage by Chavez and other foreign leaders who control oil supplies.                  

"We better understand the vulnerabilities that our economy and our very lives have when we're dependent on Iranian mullahs, and whackos in Venezuela,'' McCain said in a Jan. 22 interview on Fox News Sunday.           

 

February 03, 2008

At Last, A Do-It-Yourself Mini Nuclear Reactor

By DemocracyRules

Jetsons Soon available at Home Depot

No, not really, but close.  It’s a sealed mini-nuclear generator called the Toshiba 4S Nuclear Plant. Toshiba is test-marketing the device, and will have one operational in Japan this year.  It comes in various sizes, and can produce enough electricity for an apartment complex, town or small city.  It is a sealed unit about 6 ft by 20 ft, small enough for a garage.

It produces no radioactivity, and the fuel is not feasible for use as weapons.  The reactor has minimal moving parts, and is designed to be installed in the bottom of a 100 foot concrete-lined shaft, capped with heavy concrete.  It is to be delivered to a site and installed with a generator system.  After its design life expires, a new unit is installed, and the old one removed and shipped out by Toshiba, sort of like new batteries.

The city of Galena, Alaska is considering installing a demonstration model supplied by Toshiba.

January 29, 2008

Philadelphia Inquirer and Minneapolis Star Headed Out the Floor

By DemocracyRules

Hsiao h/t Small Dead Animals

They will go bankrupt soon unless they cut staff or increase revenues.  Is this new News or the same old news called new News?

Newspapers seem determined to ride the market right down to the bottom.  Confronted with change or extinction, they have chosen extinction. 

Marshall McLuhan said "The Medium is the Message," meaning that the medium will determine what type of information is transmitted, and how it is consumed.  McLuhan said newspapers were a 'hot' medium, served up in chunks, where you had to work to swallow it as it was, take it or leave it.  'Cool' media involve the person as a participant, and people can interact with the medium, engaging with myriad images, watching bits and pieces and changing channels or web sites. Hence, his 'Global Village' of cool media consumers. 

TV is 'cool' but blogs are cooler.  Bloggers, readers, and commenters create interactive and interlocking spheres of experience.  Forty years ago McLuhan said the hot media were doomed.  I wish they would hurry up.

January 18, 2008

Leftists Hate it When Capitalists Save the Planet

By DemocracyRules
h/t Small Dead Animals
John Robson, Ottawa Citizen:

Hairshirt "... self-interest is what's driving this greener technology. Most of us value the environmental benefits to some extent. But for all of us, digital technology means going green without suffering. Which will displease some in the organic-hair-shirt crowd.

It will upset others that companies are succeeding where governments often fail. The European Union's environment commissioner just admitted that biofuels promote rainforest destruction. Legally mandated efficient light bulbs may give some people skin problems. The failure of governments to build nuclear plants has contributed massively to greenhouse-gas production. But over there in the private sector, it's just progress progress progress. Wretched, isn't it?"

more

January 15, 2008

Virgin Atlantic Set to Try Biofuel

By DemocracyRules

FriesAlternative fuels for jets are thriving.   The US Air Force is using jet fuel derived from sequestered, or ‘trapped’ natural gas.  Jet fuel is very similar to kerosene, which is again similar to diesel fuel.  Obviously quality control is vital in aviation fuels. 

Virgin’s test aircraft will be empty, and use a  Boeing 747 running 20% biofuel, but they won’t tell people where they get it.  Maybe it’s from waste oils collected from fast-food restaurants.  That’s a common source for alternative fuel do-it-yourself hobbyists.  The trouble is the aircraft would smell like french fries.

Paul Charles, a Virgin spokesman, said "It will be a very sustainable fuel source."  (Apparently Virgins now have their own spokesman.)  Boeing likes algae for biofuel.  They estimate that 35 square kilometers of algae ponds would be enough to supply the aviation industry.  GE Aviation makes the jet engines to be tested, and only one engine will be get the biofuel mixture. Deborah Case of GE Aviation said, "This is meant to be a drop-in solution...that is one of the requirements of the project."  I hope the aircraft doesn’t smell like rotten pond water.

The founder of Virgin Atlantic, Sir Richard Branson, has joined forces with Al Gore to finance a $25 million prize for finding an effective way of removing greenhouse gases from the atmosphere.  How about biofuel algae ponds?

January 14, 2008

Run Your Car On Garbage

By DemocracyRules

h/t Instapundit

At last, now that's recycling! This is part of the cellulosic ethanol revolution.  Ethanol is now mainly derived from corn and other 'soft', carbohydrate-rich plants.  However, most plant matter cannot be processed this way because it contains cells which have a very strong cell wall made of cellulose.  That's why trees stand up, because of the cellulose in their cell walls.

Why don't we invent an ethanol processing method that can turn cellulose into alcohol?  Then we wouldn't have to fool around with corn or sugarcane.  We could process wood waste, dead leaves, grass clippings, old newspapers, used tires, even coal, and turn it into ethanol.  In fact we could process most garbage into ethanol!

Sounds good? Well that's what GM has begun to do.

December 07, 2007

Bossy Car Alert

It had to happen someday.  But so soon?

Cars are now assigning work to their owners -- by e-mail.

October 18, 2007

SiteMeter Admits: It Does Routinely Inflate Visitor Counts for High-Traffic Websites Like Daily Kos

This is "inside baseball" primarily of interest to bloggers, but bear with me.

SiteMeter -- the dominant visitor count tracking service in the blogosphere -- has quietly admitted that it does routinely overcount visitors to high traffic websites.

A blog entry at SiteMeter dated October 5, 2007 confirms what Patrick Ruffini suspected:  Visitor statistics for Daily Kos and other high-volume websites are overstated by SiteMeter for any account that does not have a premium SiteMeter membership.  That's because SiteMeter's ordinary, free membership system only tracks 100 visitors at a time.

But don't just take it from me.  Here it is, from SiteMeter itself:

SiteMeter does not currently track Unique Visits/Visitors. Our measurement is defined as a Visit. The basis of this measurement is calculated on a 30 minute time period, from the last page viewed (i.e. last activity seen).

As you are no doubt aware, a Unique Visitor is measured using a cookie (or other similar user hosted ID tag). This method permits one to measure hourly, daily, weekly, etc. unique visitors.  .  . . . .

Our current method does not depend on Cookies to track visitor length, but like the cookie method does have inherent limitations. If a person visits a site and their initial record is cycled out of the visit details database (DB) before 30 minutes, they would be considered a new visit if they returned to the site, or if they were still on the site and clicked on another page. A site that cycles through its visitors quickly may not have reliable visit length data for the same reason.

. . . .

In theory, someone sitting on a page of your site with a browser set to automatically refresh every five minutes would move to the top of the DB table every five minutes and would never drop off the list. The other thing to remember is that you are only considered a new Visit if your Last Activity was more than 30 minutes ago.

So, for a site with very high levels of Visit traffic it’s possible that a DB limited to approx 100 records would not contain enough entries to hold new visits and current visitor activity. In some cases this could result in current visits being dropped from the DB and then counted as new visits.

SiteMeter offers the option of having a larger visitor detail records with our Premium Account, which would resolve this issue. To those sites expecting large traffic volumes we recommend the Premium SiteMeter account.

As mentioned, in the coming months we’ll be launching a complete new site with new features, data points, and reports, which will include both our Current Visit methodology and the cookie base Unique Visitor counts. This will give our customers the option of examining both types of data.

Kudos for Patrick Ruffini figuring this out and for demonstrating the anomaly further on October 4, 2007.  Allahpundit has expressed polite skepticism about Ruffini's findings (also here), wondering how SiteMiter could have such a large hidden glitch, but I think SiteMeter's blog entry conclusively ends the debate.  Meryl Yourish was particularly condescending -- and wrong -- in claiming that Ruffini was wrong, and owes Ruffini an apology.  (Update: Yourish promptly admitted being at least partially wrong here.)  On the other hand, Just One Minute gets kudos for backing Patrick after some brief independent testing.

Of course, a high-traffic website can avoid overcounting its visitors by paying for SiteMeter's premium service, which tracks thousands of recent visitors.  But why would a high-traffic website voluntarily do so, when the result will only be to reduce its visitor count as measured by SiteMeter?  As AllahPundit put it:

In fact, compare SM’s free basic service to the premium service: for $6.95 a month, SM will provide details for the last 4,000 visits, not the last 100. Which means, if Ruffini’s glitch theory is correct, that a premium account will result in a much lower (and more accurate) visit count than a free, basic account. That’s an odd feature to include in your pay service, especially when bloggers depend upon higher visit counts for ad rates.

Now I know why many high-traffic sites don't have premium SiteMeter accounts.  Every 100th page view is counted as a new visitor.  It makes me wonder why I am paying for premium service.  Although my daily traffic is light, on days when I have sudden surges of traffic to the site I would end up with higher "visitor" counts if I stuck with basic service.

I like SiteMeter's premium service for other reasons, including the fact that I can see what search words people are using to reach my site.  For example, it's fascinating, and chilling, to see searches from time to time for "I want to join Al Qaeda" -- and where those searches came from.

Now that the problem has been pointed out, proven, and admtted, SiteMeter needs to solve it -- preferably in a way that doesn't require people to pay for the privilege of seeing their visitor counts go down. 

October 08, 2007

New Car Has No Reverse Gear and Can Read Your Face

2007_10_08t102033_450x307_us_japan_ Forget iPhones.  I want one of these:

TOKYO (Reuters) - For all those drivers that hate parallel parking and anything else that requires the reverse gear, Nissan could one day have the car for you.

The leading Japanese carmaker recently unveiled the Pivo 2, a battery-powered concept car with a fully rotating cabin that makes going backwards obsolete, since the driver can turn to face the direction they need to go.

Its wheels also turn 90 degrees, making parking easier.

"With this easy-to-handle car, you can feel comfortable while driving," said Masahiko Tabe, senior manager of the advanced vehicle development group at Nissan Motors.

"You can go everywhere without worrying about your driving skills." The car is as yet not for commercial sale.

The futuristic, three-seat car also comes with a robotic device that Nissan said monitors the driver's expression using censors and tailors its conversation accordingly.

The device, able to converse in English and Japanese, can help an angry driver overcome road rage or wake you up if you're prone to dozing behind the wheel, the car makers said.

"Are you sleeping? There's a cafe 500m ahead," the device said during a demonstration of the car last week. The Pivo 2 will be showcased at the Tokyo Motor Show later this month.

Nice.  My only concern is that the car looks extremely small and about as crashworthy as a reinforced aluminum can.  I don't even want to think about the unusual trajectories this vehicle with sideways-turning wheels might take in a freeway accident.  A rollover accident would not be a picnic, either.

But with a few modifications -- say, incorporating some of the same technology into a SUV -- we'll have something really useful here.

Another round of kudos to Japan for thinking outside the box.  With advanced robotics, a new moon exploration program, and vehicle innovations like this, Japan is setting an impressive technological pace.

Tiny Ultrasound Scanners to Help Detect Heart Disease

Another cool medical advance is on its way:  pocked-sized ultrasound scanners that doctors can use to check for heart disease almost as easily as they use a stethoscope.

October 07, 2007

Age of Wonder, Age of Hope. Age of Robot Suits

We'll get to wonder and hope.  But first, robot suits.

Imagine an invention that can:

  • Allow a small woman to lift weights of 50 to 100 pounds (22 to 45 kilograms) without difficulty or strain
  • Allow a caregiver to lift a person who weighs 220 pounds (100 kilograms) as if they were lifting half that weight
  • Help men, women and children with walking disabilities safely walk wherever they wish

It's not here yet, but it's rapidly on its way to becoming a reality.  In Japan, robo-suits like this one are already being developed:

Robosuit

. . . [O]n display at a trade fair this week in Tokyo was a power assist suit that makes it easier to lift an elderly person out of a wheelchair or bed.

The suit looks clunky, takes 10 minutes to put on, weighs thirty kilos (66 pounds) and has blinking lights and wires reminiscent of a robot in a sci-fi movie.

But it allows the wearer to lift a person as heavy as 100 kilos as if they were carrying only half that weight.

"I don't feel heavy at all. Because of air pumped in the suit, I just feel like I'm carrying a normal backpack," said Hiroi Tsukui, a participant in the project as she carried a young man onto a table to demonstrate to onlookers.

For now the suit, developed by Kanagawa Institute of Technology, is only made to order and generally targeted at nursing homes and hospitals.

But Tsukui hopes it will be used in ordinary homes in the future.  . . . .

Researchers are also looking to improve "robot suits" for the elderly to wear themselves for more autonomy, instead of relying on caregivers or their children.

A "muscle suit" developed by Tokyo University of Science also allows the wearer to lift heavy objects.

The half-body suit incorporates artificial muscles made of elastic rubber and nylon and air pumps for the arms.

Hiroshi Kobayashi, an associate professor at the university that spearheaded the project, admitted that hurdles remain before it could be easily used.

The suit, which weighs four kilos, presents "some safety concerns for elderly people," he said.

"So for now we have limited the suit to caretakers or even construction workers whom I think would benefit greatly from this. But we hope in the future this will give old people more mobility with their arms," he added.

Another product designed to give elderly greater mobility is auto giant Honda Motor's "Walking Assist" product which can help the elderly walk independently without the help of a cane, walking frame or arm of a carer.

The long-term possibilities are mind-boggling. 

Ordinary humans will be able to acquire superhuman strength simply by putting on the right "suit." 

Victims of spinal cord injuries will be able to "walk" again, whether they ever regain voluntary movement in their limbs or not. 

A soldier in a body-armored robot suit will be badly shot and will surprise everyone by continuing to walk or run forward a bit longer, thanks to a robot suit with a delayed reaction time.

Someone will dress their dog in a human robot suit and give us all a laugh when the dog "walks" on two feet.

Now and then, a robot suit will malfunction.  Someday, a robot suit might take a few steps by itself, startling someone.

Someone will incorporate robot suits into ballet.  The dance will be more graceful and more beautiful than you can imagine.

Someone will be caught secretly using robot technology in a sport.

Entirely new sports that incorporate robot suits will be invented.

~ ~ ~

It's a reminder that we live in an incredibly exciting era in human history.  Consider all that humans have invented, discovered, and achieved in a little more than a century:

  • Astronaut_moon Mankind took to the skies with airplanes.  We can now circle the globe with amazing speed.
  • Radio and television were invented. 
  • Antibiotics were developed, saving millions of lives.
  • Humans reached outer space and walked on the moon.  Probes landed on Mars and are venturing into the solar system and beyond.  Satellites have become commonplace.
  • The first open heart surgery was performed.
  • Organ transplantation became routine.
  • The first artificial heart was invented.
  • Scientists discovered how to use adult stem cells to repair and replace organs.
  • Scientists discovered how to restore hearing to the deaf.
  • Computers were invented and, quickly changed just about everything else.   They're in our banks.  They' re in our cars.  They're in our toys.  You learn not to jump when the toys you're putting away say something.

It's an amazing time to be alive.

There is plenty of room for worry and concern in this age -- there is in every age -- but as we observe the forward rush of science, medicine, travel, and technology, we can also draw incredible hope. 

It is no longer possible to look someone in the face and say, without fear of being proven wrong, "You'll never see again."  "You'll never walk again."  "That thing will never fly."

Now you can turn to your friend and say sincerely, in almost every situation, "I know it looks hopeless now.  But someone, somewhere, is working on a solution right now.  There's always hope."

There is always hope.

It's exciting to see what people can achieve.  The possibilities are limitless because the intelligence and creativity that flows through us comes from a Source much more awesome than we can fathom. 

When you're a kid, the days before Christmas count down so slowly.  If you're lucky, along the way you find wonder. 

Now that you're an adult, you don't have to wait for Christmas anymore.  The magic is all around you, every day.  Just lift up your eyes.  While you're at it, lift up your heart.

September 17, 2007

Great News for Diabetes Control: Implantable Insulin Sensors

A nifty new advance in diabetes care:  implantable insulin sensors:

WASHINGTON - Diabetes care is undergoing a transformation: Thousands of patients are switching from a few finger-pricks a day to track their disease to new sensors that keep guard around the clock.

The last six months brought boosts to the technology, as federal health officials approved children's use of a sensor that works for three days in a row — and cleared the longest-lasting version yet, a seven-day model, for adults.

The ultimate goal is to create an "artificial pancreas," pairing such sensors with implanted pumps that would automatically dispense insulin to make a diabetic's blood sugar better resemble a healthy person's.

That's still years away. For now, the hope is that these under-the-skin sensors will empower the most vulnerable patients — those who require insulin injections — to make changes that better control their disease. Perhaps more important, they come with alarms that can sound in time to avoid dangerously high or low blood-sugar levels.

"It really catches problems before they're problems," says Katie Clark of Grandville, Mich. She bought a sensor for her 7-year-old daughter, and no longer has to wake up in the middle of the night to spot-check whether Ellie's OK.

But these "continuous glucose monitors" cost up to $1,000, plus at least $350 a month for supplies. Insurance coverage is hit-or-miss: Some do pay but many refuse pending proof that the sensors live up to their promise of better health.

The price doesn't concern me.  It will come down as the technology is refined.

It's a great reason for anyone with diabetes to feel more hopeful.  The technology will eventually make daily life a lot easier, and many of of the serious complications of diabetes will be prevented:

Some 21 million Americans have diabetes, meaning their bodies cannot properly regulate blood sugar, or glucose. About 5 million inject insulin, a hormone that converts glucose into energy, to treat their diabetes — including the roughly 2 million with Type 1 diabetes who require those shots to live.

High glucose levels damage blood vessels and nerves, leading to blindness, kidney failure, amputations and heart disease. Frequent glucose testing — pricking a finger for a blood test four to eight times a day — helps patients maintain tighter glucose control, thus lowering risk of those complications.

But few diabetics test that often, and even frequent testers cannot know if glucose soars or plummets between tests or during sleep.

With the new technology, diabetics use a needle to insert a sensor just under the skin of the side or abdomen every three or seven days. The sensors wirelessly beam glucose readings to a pager-like device every 5 minutes.

Available now are Medtronic Inc.'s three-day Real-Time monitor — sold by itself, for adults or children, or together with a manually adjustable insulin pump — and DexCom Inc.'s STS-7 seven-day monitor for adults. A five-day competitor from Abbott Laboratories is in development.

Users require training. For example, it takes up to 15 minutes for a glucose change in blood to be reflected in the cell fluid that these sensors measure. Doctors warn to always double-check with a blood test when a sensor signals trouble.

But many learn to tell at a glance if they need a snack to head off a coming low, or an insulin dose to block a coming spike.

When Ellie Clark's sensor showed her morning oatmeal made her glucose soar to a level of 300, her mother started giving her entire morning insulin booster before breakfast. Now the 7-year-old's morning jump is to a moderate 200.

More Medical News:

September 15, 2007

Fossett Search Using Satellite Images and Volunteers

Steve_fosset_2 Would you help look for a missing person if you could do it from the comfort of your own home, taking as little as a few minutes to look?

A small army of volunteers is answering that question "yes" by helping to review satellite images for any signs of missing adventurer Steve Fossett's small plane. 

You can join the search here at Amazon's Mechanical Turk if you wish.

The technology is simple.  You will be shown a satellite image of a small area.  Just look at the picture for any sign of a plane, wreckage, or other foreign objects that merit further study.  Click "yes" or "no" and then click again to submit your answer.   

Sample_1_dg_color_2 If you're not sure whether an image contains something of interest, you can either mark it "yes" and write a few words of explanation or you can "skip" or "return" the image to let someone else do it, and you'll automatically be given a different image to review. 

It's a fascinating new application of satellite imaging technology, and an incredible way to harness the power of the internet. 

By the way, the search has already found wreckage of several other small planes.  As a result of this search, several families whose loved ones went missing long ago may finally have closure.

If you haven't yet taken done a good deed for the day, here's your chance -- give it five minutes of your time.

Earlier:  Search Continues for Missing Adventurer Steve Fossett

September 13, 2007

BREAKING NEWS: Vindicated! The Bin Laden Videos Are Fakes!

I blogged about the possible fakery in the recent Bin Laden video four days ago on September 9th ("Is the Bin Laden Video a Forgery?") and again two days ago on September 11th ("Both Recent Osama Bin Laden Videos Are Sock Puppet Fakery"), and now it's been confirmed:

On the Friday before the sixth anniversary of 9/11, Osama bin Laden appeared in a new video, his first since prior to the U.S. presidential elections in 2004. In analyzing the video, Neal Krawetz of Hactor Factor, an expert on digital image forensics, said in his latest blogs that the video contained many visual and audio splices, and that all of the modifications were of very low quality.

Most striking is bin Laden's beard, which has been gray in recent images. For this video it is black. "As far as my tools can detect, there has been no image manipulation of the bin Laden portion of the image beyond contrast adjustment. His beard really does appear to be that color." The Washington Post has the full video here.

Krawetz says the inner frame of bin Laden was resaved at least twice, and not at the same time. The images show fine horizontal stripes on bin Laden and a background indicating these came from interlaced video sources. In contrast, the text elements, such as the As-Sahab logo, appear to be from non-interlaced sources.

The September 7 video shows bin Laden dressed in a white hat, white shirt and yellow sweater. Krawetz notes "this is the same clothing he wore in the 2004-10-29 video. In 2004 he had it unzipped, but in 2007 he zipped up the bottom half. Besides the clothing, it appears to be the same background, same lighting, and same desk. Even the camera angle is almost identical." Krawetz also notes that "if you overlay the 2007 video with the 2004 video, his face has not changed in three years--only his beard is darker and the contrast on the picture has been adjusted."

More important though are the edits. At roughly a minute and a half into the video there is a splice; bin Laden shifts from looking at the camera to looking down in less than 1/25th of a second. At 13:13 there is a second, less obvious splice. In all, Krawetz says there are at least six splices in the video. Of these, there are only two live bin Laden segments, the rest of the video composed of still images. The first live section opens the video and ends at 1:56. The second section begins at 12:29 and continues until 14:01. The two live sections appear to be from different recordings "because the desk is closer to the camera in the second section."

Then there are the audio edits. Krawetz says "the new audio has no accompanying 'live' video and consists of multiple audio recordings." References to current events are made only during the still frame sections and after splices within the audio track." And there are so many splices that I cannot help but wonder if someone spliced words and phrases together. I also cannot rule out a vocal imitator during the frozen-frame audio. The only way to prove that the audio is really bin Laden is to see him talking in the video," Krawetz says.

As I wrote on September 11th:

There is no plausible explanation for Bin Laden's video image to be frozen in two separate videos while he is speaking of recent events-- except for video fakery. 

I'm more convinced than ever that Bin Laden is dead or that he has dramatically altered his appearance and seeks to avoid detection.  Either way, the video images we are seeing are years out of date.

Given the strange references to liberal hot-button issues like global warming in the latest Bin Laden video and other oddities, I think it more likely that Bin Laden is dead and that the "Bin Laden" videos are being entirely ghost-written.

As a practical matter, the West should proceed on the working assumption that Bin Laden is dead unless and until Al Qaeda produces credible video of Bin Laden in which his lips are moving when he speaks of current events.

When we fall for sock puppetry, we are being played for chumps by jihadists.  In addition to lending aid and comfort to America's enemies by our naivete, we waste precious, irreplaceable time foolishly debating the wrong questions such as "Why haven't we yet caught Bin Laden?" and whether we should withdraw from Iraq in order to look for Bin Laden in Afghanistan.

If Bin Laden is alive, let Al Qaeda prove it.  Their video sock puppetry suggests otherwise.  Either they are engaged in an elaborate double hoax to lead the world to believe that Bin Laden is dead when he really is not (a hoax which the world has yet to even recognize), or, more likely, Bin Laden is indeed worm food and the jihadists are working with their dwindling supply of old videotape and one of Bin Laden's many male relatives to record the audio track.

I am surprised that more in the blogosphere, especially on the right, have not yet sounded the alarm about the apparent Bin Laden video fakery.  In their defense, it has been a busy news week with General Petraeus's testimony to Congress and the 9/11 anniversary.  Further, the conclusion that the videos are fakes is a matter of opinion, although one supported by the evidence in hand.

As we have learned through one media mistake and distortion after another in the war on terror discovered only by the blogosphere, we cannot rely on the Associated Press or Reuters to recognize a fake when it is presented to them.  That is our job. I'm calling foul.

Remember, you read it here before you heard it from the AP, Reuters, CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, or the New York Times.

Let's see how long it takes them to catch up.

Update:  Consider all the foolish stories being uncritically printed and broadcast by the media this week that make no sense in light of this evidence.  Journalists are reporting that Osama Bin Laden is "taunting" the U.S. in his latest video. 

No, some dweeb with video editing equipment in a back room is "taunting" the U.S., while Bin Laden is mouldering in the grave (or -- remote possibility -- while he is cowering somewhere afraid to make a video that shows his current appearance). That Bin Laden is long dead is far more likely.  It's a better fit with the facts and with what we know about human nature and the nature of terrorists.

But why does it matter?

Let me ask this in return:  Should America be sending more troops to hunt for Bin Laden in Afghanistan?  Or would that be a colossal waste of time, money, soldiers' lives, energy, and resources -- because Bin Laden is already dead?

Are we better off staying to fight Al Qaeda right where we are in Iraq?

It's rather an important question, wouldn't you say?  It's more important than any other lead story you'll find in the print or broadcast media today, isn't it?

And yet we have total silence from the print and broadcast media on this story so far.  What's their excuse?  They have yet to even recognize that the issue of video fakery exists, let alone report the evidence that confirms these videos are fakes.

Update:  A little example of Bin Laden video fakery for your amusement.

__________________________

Like this story?  Digg It.

July 27, 2007

A Nation with the "Right Stuff" Doesn't Overreact to Two Drunk Astronauts

Today's news brings the story that astronauts "may" have been drunk when their rockets took off on "at least two occasions":

NASA let astronauts fly drunk on at least two occasions, an independent panel said in a report released Friday.

The report gave no names and did not say when the drinking occurred, how many astronauts were involved, or whether they were flying on the space shuttle, the Russian Soyuz spaceship, or aboard NASA's training airplanes.

It has all the makings of a big, embarrassing scandal, doesn't it?  It's certainly being portrayed that way.

So why am I not impressed?

It's all about perspective.

If an astronaut is about to launch into space sitting on top of a hundred million gallons of highly explosive fuel, in a rocket ship with about two million parts, all of it built by the lowest bidder, a stiff drink or two would seem to be a reasonable response.

Sure, in a perfect world astronauts would never be nervous or would seek only medically-approved sedation, and they would never consume alcohol before a flight.  After all, a space shuttle or any rocket is a very expensive piece of equipment, and a lot is at stake with every flight.

But in a perfect world, test pilot Chuck Yeager would have been grounded before he ever broke the sound barrier.  If you've read Yeager's autobiography, you know he broke important, commonsense rules about every ten days -- probably without exaggeration.  Shot down over occupied France during World War II, he evaded capture and eventually made his way back to his squadron, but was supposed to be sent home because he'd had contact with the French resistance.  He managed to get around that rule and stay in the fight. 

On the day Chuck Yeager broke the sound barrier, he flew with two broken ribs.  He could barely get into the airplane or shut the door.  How does that compare to being drunk?  I'd say that two broken ribs is the greater impairment.  And a test flight is incredibly demanding on the skills of the pilot.

Or how about this story Yeager tells?:

Back in the days when we were undergoing squadron training, I had got friendly with a Joe & Ma Clifford who had a ranch near Tonopah. Joe had told me that he’d like to get rid of a tree that stood near the roadway to their house. The next day, I umm, kinda buzzed that tree in my P-39 and took the top clean off! When I landed, the Sergeant in charge of maintenance said to me, “What the hell happened there Yeager?” I replied “I hit a bird” he said to me “Well, that son of a bitch must’ve been sitting in one helluva high nest “. So I got grounded from flying the P-39 for a week, but I was lucky I didn’t get court marshaled.”

Read a whole lot more in Yeager's autobiography, which you'll throughly enjoy if you like reading about America's early test pilots and the dawn of space travel:

If you disapprove of his methods -- and his superiors often did -- do you like the results Yeager got?  Did he have the right stuff?

Some of the same character traits that make astronauts courageous and bold enough to put their lives on the line also tend to make them unlikely to feel constrained by every last iota of conventional wisdom.

And if NASA decided to look the other way once or twice when an astronaut showed up for a launch looking a bit inebriated, it's because NASA didn't think the problem was a serious threat to the flight. 

It's not the end of the world.  We don't actually have to flog to death every breach of protocol.  All NASA needs to do is to clarify and enforce its rules in the future and move on.

We need to look forward, not back.  Space is our future, and space travel will soon be routine. 

This will all look silly in hindsight.  Was Christopher Columbus inebriated when he sailed?  Did Magellan ever respond to the onset of a terrible storm by taking a stiff drink that argaubly impaired his reflexes and judgment?  Who cares? 

History will write the story of our success.  Only rarely is a kingdom lost for want of a nail

America's space program is truly making history, and if we can't take an error or two in stride, we truly lack the right stuff.

______________________________

Trackback at Point Five

July 18, 2007

If Al Qaeda Is "Evolving," Why Can't America's Iraq Strategy Evolve Too?

Here's what passes for the conventional wisdom on Iraq:  The war was badly planned and therefore is failing miserably.  As a result, America's only option is to fold up the entire operation and slink away, leaving the Iraqis to whatever bloodbath awaits them.  We've reached the point of no return; the war is irretrievably lost; and no amount of rethinking or redoubling of effort will make any difference.

Meanwhile, Al Qaeda's early losses in the war on terror, including the deaths of major leaders such as Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and possibly Osama Bin Ladin himself, are completely irrelevant, since Al Qaeda is "evolving" constantly and is planning mass casualty attacks on the U.S.:

Al Qaeda terrorists are rebuilding their capabilities and continuing to plan mass-casualty attacks inside the United States, according to an intelligence assessment made public yesterday.

"We assess [al Qaeda] has protected or regenerated key elements of its homeland attack capability, including a safe haven in ... Pakistan [tribal areas], operational lieutenants and its top leadership," according to the National Intelligence Estimate (NIE), a consensus analysis of 16 U.S. intelligence agencies.

"Although we have discovered only a handful of individuals in the United States with ties to al Qaeda senior leadership since 9/11, we judge that al Qaeda will intensify its efforts to put operatives here," the report stated.

Retired Vice Adm. Michael McConnell, the director of national intelligence whose office produced the NIE, said the United States will face a "persistent and evolving terrorist threat" in the next three years.

The seven-page public summary of the classified report said the United States is in a "heightened threat environment."

"They're working as hard as they can in positioning trained operatives here in the United States," Mr. McConnell said. "They have recruitment programs to bring recruits into [the tribal] region of Pakistan [who] could come to the United States, fit into the population and then use some of the training that they receive in the Pakistani area for explosives and so on."

Is the contrast between the defeatism of the media in viewing America's chances in the Iraq war and the endless optimism for Al Qaeda's chances stark enough for you?

Al Qaeda remains a threat because it is "continuing to plan" further attacks and "will intensify its efforts" and its members are "working as hard as they can."

But when it comes to the Iraq war, working harder, intensifying efforts, rethinking, and continuing to plan are off the table for the United States.  The only option we have is to rip our leaders from limb to limb, metaphorically speaking, for having started the war.  Since things look bleak now, they're going to stay that way no matter what America does, and its only option is to turn tail and run.

Don't tell me we've tried long enough and hard enough in Iraq and there's no point in continuing any longer.  Nonsense.  Al Qaeda's attacks on the U.S. predate the Iraq war, but nobody seems to be pulling out a stopwatch and insisting that Al Qaeda's chances of striking a mortal blow at the U.S. or the West are forever lost.

What a fitting metaphor is Harry Reid's surrender slumberthon in the Senate tonight.  Harry Reid knows how to lose a war he has already declared lost.  The solution is quite simple:  Lie down, accept defeat, and make no effort to prevail.

In the real world, the margin between victory and defeat is rarely great, but the outcome matters a great deal.  The margin of victory usually turns on one thing:  motivation.  If we are motivated to win; if we are determined; if we are constantly "rebuilding our capabilities" and "continuing to plan" and "intensifying our efforts  and "working as hard as we can," then there are very few forces on earth that can stand in our way.

By the same token, if we are frequently announcing that we've already lost and that our cause is hopeless, and holding slumberthons to protest our own nation's continued effort to prevail, then we certainly can bring about our own defeat.

Update:  Today brings a stunningly important speech from Senator John McCain (via Captain's Quarters):

Mr. President, we have nearly finished this little exhibition, which was staged, I assume, for the benefit of a briefly amused press corps and in deference to political activists opposed to the war who have come to expect from Congress such gestures, empty though they may be, as proof that the majority in the Senate has heard their demands for action to end the war in Iraq. The outcome of this debate, the vote we are about to take, has never been in doubt to a single member of this body. And to state the obvious, nothing we have done for the last twenty-four hours will have changed any facts on the ground in Iraq or made the outcome of the war any more or less important to the security of our country. The stakes in this war remain as high today as they were yesterday; the consequences of an American defeat are just as grave; the costs of success just as dear. No battle will have been won or lost, no enemy will have been captured or killed, no ground will have been taken or surrendered, no soldier will have survived or been wounded, died or come home because we spent an entire night delivering our poll-tested message points, spinning our soundbites, arguing with each other, and substituting our amateur theatrics for statesmanship. All we have achieved are remarkably similar newspaper accounts of our inflated sense of the drama of this display and our own temporary physical fatigue. Tomorrow the press will move on to other things and we will be better rested. But nothing else will have changed.

In Iraq, American soldiers, Marines, sailors and airmen are still fighting bravely and tenaciously in battles that are as dangerous, difficult and consequential as the great battles of our armed forces’ storied past. Our enemies will still be intent on defeating us, and using our defeat to encourage their followers in the jihad they wage against us, a war which will become a greater threat to us should we quit the central battlefield in defeat. The Middle East will still be a tinderbox, which our defeat could ignite in a regional war that will imperil our vital interests at risk there and draw us into a longer and far more costly war. The prospect of genocide in Iraq, in which we will be morally complicit, is still as real a consequence of our withdrawal today as it was yesterday.

During our extended debate over the last few days, I have heard senators repeat certain arguments over and over again. My friends on the other side of this argument accuse those of us who oppose this amendment with advocating “staying the course,” which is intended to suggest that we are intent on continuing the mistakes that have put the outcome of the war in doubt. Yet we all know that with the arrival of General Petraeus we have changed course. We are now fighting a counterinsurgency strategy, which some of us have argued we should have been following from the beginning, and which makes the most effective use of our strength and does not strengthen the tactics of our enemy. This new battle plan is succeeding where our previous tactics have failed, although the outcome remains far from certain. The tactics proposed in the amendment offered by my friends, Senators Levin and Reed – a smaller force, confined to bases distant from the battlefield, from where they will launch occasional search and destroy missions and train the Iraqi military – are precisely the tactics employed for most of this war and which have, by anyone’s account, failed miserably. Now, that, Mr. President, is staying the course, and it is a course that inevitably leads to our defeat and the catastrophic consequences for Iraq, the region and the security of the United States our defeat would entail.

Yes, we have heard quite a lot about the folly of “staying the course,” though the real outcome should this amendment prevail and be signed into law, would be to deny our generals and the Americans they have the honor to command the ability to try, in this late hour, to address the calamity these tried and failed tactics produced, and salvage from the wreckage of our previous failures a measure of stability for Iraq and the Middle East, and a more secure future for the American people.

I have also listened to my colleagues on the other side repeatedly remind us that the American people have spoken in the last election. They have demanded we withdraw from Iraq, and it is our responsibility to do, as quickly as possible, what they have bid us to do. But is that our primary responsibility? Really, Mr. President, is that how we construe our role: to follow without question popular opinion even if we believe it to be in error, and likely to endanger the security of the country we have sworn to defend? Surely, we must be responsive to the people who have elected us to office, and who, if it is their wish, will remove us when they become unsatisfied with our failure to heed their demands. I understand that, of course. And I understand why so many Americans have become sick and tired of this war, given the many, many mistakes made by civilian and military leaders in its prosecution. I, too, have been made sick at heart by these mistakes and the terrible price we have paid for them. But I cannot react to these mistakes by embracing a course of action that I know will be an even greater mistake, a mistake of colossal historical proportions, which will -- and I am as sure of this as I am of anything – seriously endanger the people I represent and the country I have served all my adult life. I have many responsibilities to the people of Arizona, and to all Americans. I take them all seriously, Mr. President, or try to. But I have one responsibility that outweighs all the others – and that is to do everything in my power, to use whatever meager talents I posses, and every resource God has granted me to protect the security of this great and good nation from all enemies foreign and domestic. And that I intend to do, Mr. President, even if I must stand athwart popular opinion. I will explain my reasons to the American people. I will attempt to convince as many of my countrymen as I can that we must show even greater patience, though our patience is nearly exhausted, and that as long as there is a prospect for not losing this war, then we must not choose to lose it. That is how I construe my responsibility to my constituency and my country. That is how I construed it yesterday. It is how I construe it today. And it is how I will construe it tomorrow. I do not know how I could choose any other course.

I cannot be certain that I possess the skills to be persuasive. I cannot be certain that even if I could convince Americans to give General Petraeus the time he needs to determine whether we can prevail, that we will prevail in Iraq. All I am certain of is that our defeat there would be catastrophic, not just for Iraq, but for us, and that I cannot be complicit in it, but must do whatever I can, whether I am effective or not, to help us try to avert it. That, Mr. President, is all I can possibly offer my country at this time. It is not much compared to the sacrifices made by Americans who have volunteered to shoulder a rifle and fight this war for us. I know that, and am humbled by it, as we all are. But though my duty is neither dangerous nor onerous, it compels me nonetheless to say to my colleagues and to all Americans who disagree with me: that as long as we have a chance to succeed we must try to succeed.

I am privileged, as we all are, to be subject to the judgment of the American people and history. But, my friends, they are not always the same judgment. The verdict of the people will arrive long before history’s. I am unlikely to ever know how history has judged us in this hour. The public’s judgment of me I will know soon enough. I will accept it, as I must. But whether it is favorable or unforgiving, I will stand where I stand, and take comfort from my confidence that I took my responsibilities to my country seriously, and despite the mistakes I have made as a public servant and the flaws I have as an advocate, I tried as best I could to help the country we all love remain as safe as she could be in an hour of serious peril.

NEWS & BUZZ

DAILY CARTOON click to enlarge
ANDERTOONS.COM DAILY CARTOONS

WEBSITES TO EXPLORE

  • Blogroll Me!

    "New!" websites were updated within the last 6 hours

SUPPORT OUR ADVERTISERS

GINA COBB

  • The 2006 Weblog Awards
  • "This is a great blog." (Jack Jones)
  • ". . . Gina Cobb is proof that not all lawyers deserve the death penalty." (Gringoman.com)(Gee -- thanks!)
  • "Let the charming and talented Gina Cobb show you how important rhetorical argument can be." (No-Pasaran.blogspot.com)