By DemocracyRules
So this pompous, poisonous, avaricious, dictatorial narcissist wants to talk, eh? He wants to discuss things with the tea party protesters. Or, at least his teleprompter says he does. OK, let's talk. Here are some topics.
(1) You are not eligible to be President. You are an impostor. As any child who reads the Constitution can clearly see, this document was written by people who were founding a new country. They did not want their country to be ruled by someone who was disloyal to their country. They wanted to be independent. That was the entire point of the War of Independence. Therefore, the Framers forbade divided loyalties in all US presidents, and insisted that all those in the future had to be Natural Born Citizens. Obama, what part of the phrase, "you are not eligible," do you not understand?
(2) The Framers feared that divided loyalties in the president would undermine the country. A president who paid obeisance to a "foreign prince," as it was called then, was dangerous. He might kiss the hands of foreign "princes," seeking their support and direction.
Such a president might be a traitor to his own country. He might deliberately run up the deficit until it was impossible to pay it back. He might falsely repeat again and again, ad nauseam, that this was the "worst economic crisis since the great depression." He might do this even if the economy was expected to recover by the end of 2009.
He might take trillions of taxpayer's money and pay off his foreign sponsors and cronies. He might pay off people in state legislatures to buy their future loyalties. He might pay off the members of the federal opposition, to silence them. For example, he might forbid them to ask about his eligibility.
He might pay for the humiliation or degradation of his critics. He might have former homosexual lovers killed. He might kill or silence anyone who connects him to the 9/11 terrorists. He might use taxpayers' money to buy up large companies, so he can control them personally. He might use billions to build his own army. Obama, are you ready to accept personal responsibility for the bankrupting of America? Yes or No?
(3) A disloyal president might also degrade the military and intelligence sectors. He might declare that anyone who fails to support him is a "right-wing extremist." He might divert resources from the department of homeland security to harass and disenfranchise these "right-wing extremists." He may order the FBI to send thousands of staff to monitor approximately 500 tea parties and spy on the organizers.
He might cut back the military budget. He might bring bogus criminal charges against loyal members of intelligence agencies. He might declassify secret CIA material, to weaken America. He may try to demoralize and paralyze the intelligence community.
He might disclose military secrets to the enemy. For example, he might give secrets about new military helicopters to Iran. He might enable hackers to steal secrets about the new F-35 fighter. He might cancel the production of the other new US fighter, the F-22. He might cancel the anti-ballistic missile (Star Wars) program.
He might cancel the Airborne Laser(ABL) program, because it might displease his benefactors. For example, the US military and intelligence community could use the ABL to fry certain foreign "princes". They would do this only if they detected an extreme threat. For example, they might take such action if they learned that certain foreign "princes" had gained control of the US Executive Branch. Obama, if you are found guilty of sedition, are you willing to personally accept these penalties? Yes or no?
(4) A US president who took orders from foreign "princes" would probably work in the best interests of those "princes" . If the "princes" said, 'destroy Israel,' then the president might do it, even if it weakened America.
He might limit or deny military support for Israel. He might support the Saudi "peace plan" which is designed to obliterate Israel. He might give weapons and money to Lebanon, a country which is still technically at war with Israel. He might encourage and finance Lebanon's purchase of Turkish arms, and military training for the Lebanese army. He might make peace with Syria, which has been caught red-handed collaborating with North Korea in making plutonium, which has no other purpose than for nuclear bombs.
He might give hundreds of millions to Hamas, who have sworn to destroy Israel. He might demand Israel make peace with the Palestinian Authority, which just re-emphasized it would never make peace with Israel. He might require Israel to accept the Saudi "peace plan," in exchange for helping to stall Iran for a while.
He might stand idly by while North Korea tests weapons of mass destruction, and unilaterally ends all disarmament talks, so it can make nuclear warheads for its Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs). He might permit Iran and North Korea to collaborate on this, so Iran can also have these weapons. Obama, will you stand on the walls of Jerusalem to defend Israel with your life? Yes or no?
(5) A disloyal president might help foreign "princes" buy control over the Associate Press, Reuters, American newspaper chains, and TV networks. They may even buy significant shareholdings in FOX. Then he and these foreign "princes" could control the American MSM. The MSM could stifle all discussion about eligibility. The MSM might ignore, defame, and belittle the opposition at every opportunity. The president, under the directions of these foreign "princes", might take over the airwaves whenever he felt like it, to teleprompt his way through boring, rambling, anti-American speeches. He might pass "hate laws" which empower him to abrogate the first amendment and stifle any political discourse he dislikes. Obama, do you believe the truth shall set you free? Are you ready to accept free speech and the public dissemination of truth, whatever that may be?
(6) No wonder the Framers worried about a president who had divided loyalties. It is impossible to trust anything Obama does. Prima facie, he is not working in the best interests of America and the Constitution. He is working in his own interests, or in the interests of foreign "princes." Furthermore, given the "president" has violated the eligibility provision of the Constitution, he cannot be relied upon to defend the Constitution. The Constitution is his enemy. He may ignore or trample on the Constitution whenever it suits him. If he supported the Constitution, and declared himself faithful to it, he would have to resign from office. Obama, for the greater good of America, will you resign from office?
Obama, think well on your answers, for one day, at some point in the infinite future, you and your reputation will be held to account. We will be patient if necessary. Today, on the Jewish calendar, it is Iyar 6, in the year 5769. Jezebel lived in ca. 900 BC, but she remains damned for all time.
(References for all that is written here are available on request.)
Pro Patria
Comments