« What Do You Call Ten Terrorists in One House? | Main | What TV News Producers Don't Want You to Know About Iraq »
DrudgeReport leaked the news today that Prince Harry is serving on the front lines in Afghanistan.
Of course, the entire reason the depoloyment was shrouded in secrecy was to avoid putting Prince Harry and other troops in Afghanistan at additional risk.
Whose side is Drudge on? Only his own?
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c2c6053ef00e55089956f8833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Why Is Drudge Putting Prince Harry and Other Troops at Greater Risk?:
» Afternoon round up. from Neocon News
Sorry that posting has been light today, but Ive got lots of things to do that (unfortunately) dont involve clacking away at a keyboard. Here are some of the stories Im reading, even if I dont have the time to write about th... [Read More]
The comments to this entry are closed.
Authors: Gina Cobb Democracy Rules Gawfer
Want to be a guest author? Email ginacobbfeedback "at" yahoo.com
The media (and that includes 'newish media') has been slanted toward their own petty gains for far longer than they have been slanted Left.
Journalism is dead. Long live Capitalism! (Oops, they wouldn't run that phrase in the headlines now, would they?)
Posted by: Dan Oblak - MacBigot.com | February 28, 2008 at 04:56 PM
when i read about drudge a lot of words sprang to mind describing him but I knew you would not print them. Suffice to say he is stuck with his name for the rest of his life!
Posted by: Philip James | February 29, 2008 at 04:43 PM
I'm waiting for the Republican outrage at Drudge for this endangering allied soldiers. Imagine if the NY Times had done something similar. Oh wait, it did! Rush, Sean, Ann and the rest called for treason charges against the Times for reporting on illegal, warrantless wiretaps.
Posted by: just pixels | March 01, 2008 at 09:35 AM