My Photo

COMMENTS?

  • We love comments, but they are treated like letters to the editor. Only some are permanently published. Comments are auto-deleted if they contain profanity (including profanity using ast*ri*ks). They may also be edited or deleted if they include statements that are false, misleading, unfair, defamatory, insulting, unethical, immoral, illogical, redundant, or off topic. Rude comments or spam will result in a permanent website ban (comments auto-deleted), so don't do that. Thanks.

Like This Blog?

  • Add this blog to my Technorati Favorites!

    Subscribe in NewsGator Online

    Add to Google

    Subscribe in Bloglines

    Add to My AOL

  • Word of the Day

    This Day in History

    In the News

    Quote of the Day

    Spelling Bee
    difficulty level:
    score: -
    please wait...
     
    spell the word:

    Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

« Columbian Hostage: "We Live Like the Dead" | Main | L.A. Times' Tim Rutten Says CNN "Corrupt" in Handling of Debate »

December 02, 2007

The New Republic's Fog of Arrogance

The New Republic has finally admitted that it can no longer stand by the accuracy of stories it published over five months ago in which an American soldier, Scott Thomas Beauchamp, made wild derogatory claims about soldiers serving with him in Iraq.

It takes The New Republic 14 pages of online text (roughly 10,000 words) to finally get to the painful bottom line admission:

In retrospect, we never should have put Beauchamp in this situation. He was a young soldier in a war zone, an untried writer without journalistic training. We published his accounts of sensitive events while granting him the shield of anonymity--which, in the wrong hands, can become license to exaggerate, if not fabricate.

When I last spoke with Beauchamp in early November, he continued to stand by his stories. Unfortunately, the standards of this magazine require more than that. And, in light of the evidence available to us, after months of intensive re-reporting, we cannot be confident that the events in his pieces occurred in exactly the manner that he described them. Without that essential confidence, we cannot stand by these stories.

It's nice that The New Republic has finally admitted the obvious, but it should not get off the hook this easily.  It is not "the standards of this magazine" that brought Beauchamp's story down.  It is the diligence and determination of bloggers, especially Confederate Yankee.  (Among others who pressed the story were Michael Goldfarb at the Weekly Standard, Ace of Spades, and Michelle Malkin.)

What's left in tatters is The New Republic's credibility.  The magazine left its readers hanging for over five months on this story, even though major factual innacuracies were known long ago.  During that time, TNR's reaction to the controversy was alternately to sneer at, or to ignore, its critics.

The New Republic blames this fiasco on "The Fog of War."

No, it's more like "The Fog of Vision-Clouding Bias," the "Fog of Inability to Take Responsibility" and, most of all, "The Fog of Arrogance."

Sadly, the fog still lingers at The New Republic.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c2c6053ef00e54fa6f9ad8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The New Republic's Fog of Arrogance:

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.

NEWS & BUZZ

GINA COBB

  • Copyright © 2005

    Authors:

    Gina Cobb

    Democracy Rules

    Gawfer

    Want to be a guest author? Email ginacobbfeedback "at" yahoo.com

  • The 2006 Weblog Awards
  • "This is a great blog." (Jack Jones)
  • ". . . Gina Cobb is proof that not all lawyers deserve the death penalty." (Gringoman.com)(Gee -- thanks!)
  • "Let the charming and talented Gina Cobb show you how important rhetorical argument can be." (No-Pasaran.blogspot.com)

WEBSITES TO EXPLORE

  • DAILY CARTOON click to enlarge
    ANDERTOONS.COM DAILY CARTOONS
  • Blogroll Me!

    "New!" websites were updated within the last 6 hours